Introduction to Clinical Trial Research#

Presenter : Sang Ho Park

Clinical Research#

  • Basically focuses on human.

  • Two types : Clinical trial / Observational study

Clinical trial#

  • Prospective interventional study according to clinical trial protocol

  • Follow over time until specific events occur or follow-up ends

  • Have a potential risk to clinical trial participants.

  • to know whether specific intervention is safe and efficacious.

Observational study#

  • may be prospective or retrospective

  • observe participants without assigning treatments according to a protocol

  • Types : Case-control study, cross-sectional study, cohort study

Clinical Trial Phase#

Information on specific intervention develops through previous clinical research and non-clinical research (such as cell experiment or animal research). Each clinical trial phase provides evidence about safety and efficacy.

Phase 1

  • Research question focuses primarily on safety

  • to determine dose range and to figure out pharmacokinetics (about body absorption) and pharmacodynamics (about body reaction)

Phase 2 (or exploratory study)

  • Research question focuses on safety and efficacy

  • phase IIA / phase IIB

    • phase IIA : proof-of-concept with small numbers of subjects

    • phase IIB : conducted on a large number of participants and determine optimal dose

Phase 3 (or confirmatory study)

  • conducted in a large population during a longer period

  • to confirm if specific intervention has safety and efficacy to a target population

  • In general, treatment assignment is randomized

  • Compare specific intervention vs placebo (not severe) or standard-of-care treatment (often severe disease)

  • Regulatory approval from FDA or MFDS…

Randomization#

  • assigns subjects to treatment group or control group by chance

  • offers similar baseline characteristics between treatment group and control group so that they are comparable

  • removes confounding bias and selection bias

  • Imbalance may occur by chance or a system

Randomization techniques#

  • Simple randomization

    • simply assigns treatment groups by chance.

    • may result in imbalance when sample size is small

  • Block randomization

    • using a set of blocks with pre-specified assignments with randomness

      • Ex) If block size is a four and allocation ratio of two-arm trial is equal, blocks will be AABB, ABAB, ABBA, BAAB, BABA, and BBAA

    • can be unblinded by principal investigator if he or she knows the block size

      • Often use different block sizes such as 4 and 6.

        • Ex: AABB ABABBA …

  • Stratified randomization

    • randomization utilizing a few prognostic factors

      • Ex) Sex (Male vs Female). Randomized participants within male and female separately

    • The number of stratification variables should be restricted

      • Ex) The number of strata for Sex (male vs female) and disease severity (mild vs moderate vs severe) is 6 (2 * 3)

Equipoise#

  • Genuine uncertainty on clinical trial interventions in terms of relative merits

  • Clinical equipoise

    • refers to equipoise within medical experts community

  • Ethical basis

    • Clinical trial should be based on clinical equipoise to protect participants’ right.

Parallel Group and Crossover Designs#

  • Parallel Design

    • Assigned by randomization and remained until the study ends.

  • Crossover Design

    • randomized to a series of interventions.

      • Ex) Two-arm crossover trial : AB or BA

    • Washout period is needed

Multi-Arm and Factorial Designs#

  • Multi-arm designs

    • more than two arms

    • shared control group or head-to-head comprison

  • Factorial designs

    • a set of combinations of interventions

    • equal to or more than two interventions

      • Ex) Two set of interventions A, B : A alone group, B alone group, A+B group, no A nor B group

Fixed Sample Trial Design#

  • Fixed maximum sample size

  • Fixed a number of interventions

  • Fixed a recruitment period

    • Trial design, trial conduct according to pre-planned protocol, analysis according to pre-planned statistical analysis plan

Adaptive Trial Design#

  • Pre-specified adaptive components based on trial data such as allocation ratio, sample size, and eligibility

Master Protocol#

  • In general, one hypothesis in clinical trial needs one protocol.

  • Master protocol oversees multiple interventional hypotheses. Therefore, we call it as ā€œMaster protocolā€

  • Type : Platform trial, basket trial, umbrella trial

  • Platform trial

    • with multiple interventions vs shared a control group

    • with flexibility such as addition of interventions

  • Basket trial

    • multiple disease (different cancers) with a common risk factor (such as EGFR mutation)

    • can be platform trial

  • Umbrella trial

    • multiple targeted therapies (various mutations) in a single disease (such as breast cancer)

    • can be platform trial

Estimands#

ICH E9 (R1) Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials describes the concept of estimands.

  • Scientific question of interest

  • trial objective

    • The target population

    • Treatment strategy

    • Endpoint (given specific outcome)

    • Strategies for handling intercurrent events

      • Intercurrent events could hinder the causal estimation of intervention in terms of clinical question of interest

    • Summary measurement

  • Intention-to-treat (ITT) principle

    • statistical analysis is performed in accordance to assigned group whether they received actual intervention

  • Per-protocol (PP) analysis

    • Including only data from participants who follow the protocol

    • can occur selection bias

  • Strategies for handling intercurrent events

    • Treatment policy strategy

      • The intercurrent event is considered as irrelevant. It is related to ITT principle

      • Most common estimand

    • Composite strategy

      • Intercurrent event is integrated in an endpoint. For example, outcome could be defined as no rescue therapy and an improved clinical outcome.

    • Hypothetical strategy

      • Imagine intercurrent event is not occurred so missing imputation is needed when participants have experienced intercurrent event

    • While on treatment strategy

      • analyze participants’ data until intercurrent event occurs

    • Principal stratum strategy

      • Subpopulations of interest are defined on the occurrence of intercurrent events.

      • Analyze subpopulation

  • population-level summary measure

    • could include odds ratio, risk ratio, or hazard ratio and so on.

Sample Size and Statistical Power Determination#

  • Statistical Power

    • When treatment has an effect, statistical power denotes the probability of detecting an effect (informal definition).

    • When alternative hypothesis is true, statistical power denotes the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis (formal definition).

    • Typically setting 80%

  • Type 1 error

    • When null hypothesis is true, type 1 error denotes the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis.

    • The level of significance

      • accepted level of type 1 error rate in a clinical research

      • In general, typically setting 5%

  • Sample size calculation

    • Utilizing type 1 error, statistical power, effect size, standard deviation, and allocation ratio

    • pre-planned value prior to the start of clinical trial

Frequentist vs Bayesian Statistics#

Frequentist statistics consider the unknown parameter is fixed but Bayesian statistics consider the unknown parameter is a random variable. Frequentist approach repeats sampling procedures and estimate utilizing sampling uncertainty. Bayesian approach considers unknown parameter follows a probability distribution. Uncertainty isĀ representedĀ by the probability distribution of unknown parameter.

For example, frequentist approach repeats sampling procedure and gets confidence intervals with 100 numbers. A confidence interval may include or not include unknown parameter because unknown parameter is fixed quantity. 95% confidence interval stands for 95% of confidence intervals will include the unknown parameter.

However, in bayesian approach, incorporating prior distribution (prior belief on unknown parameter) and likelihood (observed), unknown parameter follows a probability distribution (posterior distribution). We could construct 95% credible interval directly from a probability distribution.

p-value is the probability of obtaining test results at least as extreme as the result actually observed, under the assumption that the null hypothesis is correct (wikipedia en). When p-value is below 0.05, null hypothesis would be rejected. However, A p-value of 0.01 does not mean that the probability of null hypothesis is true is 0.01.